anonymous · 1d

Between Breaks and Sweep, which one do you feel would be the most likely to take a stupid risk?
Say its been an especially lean handful of months and someone drops a sum of money large enough to fix all that right in front of them. Which one would be more likely to do something... inadvisable, for that money?

Signed: A writer with nefarious intent (different person from the last one. hello other pervert! 👋)

y'all wild, i got writers n shit in my inbox ...

that's a tough one .. i think obviously breaks right? sweep is too chill n dumb to worry about that sorta thing, i think breaks would be desperate enough to do something stupid for money? like uuugh i'd do just about anything to afford to just order pizza this week. however: i think sweep could also be aloof enough to do something stupid for money on accident. like they would put themselves up to something and then not realize until too late that it's stupid. but they'd also still probably be chill about that too tbh ... sweep's just funny. breaks would get in trouble and sweep could be like "what's even wrong man" and step in to take their place.

Alterspring uses Markdown for formatting

*italic text* for italic text

**bold text** for bold text

[link](https://example.com) for link